By: Derek Hawkins//January 31, 2018//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: William Hurt, et al., v. Matthew Wise, et al.,
Case No.: 17-1771; 17-1777
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and FLAUM and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Malicious Prosecution Claim
Andrea, Deadra, and William Hurt were all arrested after their uncle, Marcus Golike, was found dead on the banks of the Ohio River. The arrests came after Deadra and William “confessed” that they, with some help from Andrea, murdered Golike. But one by one, each was absolved. Andrea was never criminally charged. The charges against Deadra were dropped after four months. And while the state prosecuted William, he was not convicted on any charge.
With the criminal proceedings behind them, Andrea, Deadra, and William filed a civil suit against the officers and detectives involved in their arrests and prosecutions. Their claims focus on the interrogations of Deadra and William, the decisions to arrest all three plaintiffs, and the alleged fabrication of evidence by the police. All defendants filed motions for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. For the most part, the district court denied the motions. The defendants challenge those rulings in this interlocutory appeal. We conclude that with minor exceptions the district court correctly assessed the situation.
The district court’s summary judgment ruling is REVERSED with respect to Deadra’s malicious prosecution claim against defendants Arbaugh and Pagett. We also conclude that the district court should have eliminated the substantive‐due‐ process theory. In all other respects, insofar as we have jurisdiction to act here, we AFFIRM the order of the district court denying qualified immunity to the defendants.
Reversed in part. Affirmed in part.