By: Derek Hawkins//November 20, 2017//
WI Court of Appeals – District IV
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Jamie M. Srb
Case No.: 2017AP307-CR
Officials: SHERMAN, J.
Focus: Inadmissible Evidence
Jamie Srb appeals from a judgment of conviction following a jury trial for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant, second offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1). Srb contends the circuit court erred in concluding that the results from Srb’s blood alcohol concentration test were admissible at trial. Srb argues that the test results were not admissible because the test was not administered within three hours of driving and because expert testimony establishing the probative value of the test results was not admissible. For reasons explained below, I affirm.