Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing

By: Derek Hawkins//August 8, 2016//

Sentencing

By: Derek Hawkins//August 8, 2016//

Listen to this article

7th Circuit court of Appeals

Case Name: United States of America v. George E. Robey

Case No.: 15-2172

Officials: EASTERBROOK, KANNE, and SYKES, Circuit Judges

Focus: Sentencing

Courts relevant conduct determination was adequately based on findings of a common scheme or plan.

“Robey’s main argument against a “common scheme or plan,” focuses on the temporal “gap” between the charged and uncharged vehicles. Robey’s assertion is belied by the record—there was only a four‐month “gap” between the latest uncharged vehicle stolen on December 16, 2010 and the earliest charged vehicle on April 17, 2011. (PSR ¶ 21.) Further‐ more, the multiple commonalities discussed above “more than suffice” to overcome any alleged temporal “gap” and support the court’s relevant conduct determination. Baines, 777 F.3d at 963–64 (rejecting defendant’s temporal gap argument as “hollow” because the offenses were connected by “multiple common factors”)”

Affirmed

Full Text


Attorney Derek A. Hawkins is the managing partner at Hawkins Law Offices LLC, where he heads up the firm’s startup law practice. He specializes in business formation, corporate governance, intellectual property protection, private equity and venture capital funding and mergers & acquisitions. Check out the website at www.hawkins-lawoffices.com or contact them at 262-737-8825.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests