By: Derek Hawkins//June 13, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Matthew D. Claussen v. Michael R. Pence
Case No.: 16-1003
Officials: POSNER and FLAUM, Circuit Judges, and ALONSO, District Judge
Focus: Challenge to Legislation
Legislation prohibiting persons holding elected office from being employed as civil servant in same unit of government did not violate 1st or 14th amendment.
“The Indiana Law surely passes muster under rational basis review. There is a clear, rational relationship between pre‐ venting actual and perceived corruption and Indiana’s treatment of municipal employees. Although government contractors who hold elected office could use their voting power to enrich themselves at the expense of the public, Indiana sub‐ jects government contractors to extensive disclosure requirements, which reduces the risk of self‐dealing. And even if the risk of self‐dealing were identical for contractors and employees, Indiana is not required to address all manifestations of public corruption at once. See FCC v. Beach Commc’ns, Inc., 508 U.S. 307, 316 (1993) (holding that the State “must be allowed leeway to approach a perceived problem incrementally”); Clements, 457 U.S. at 969 (“The Equal Protection Clause allows the State to regulate one step at a time, addressing itself to the phase of the problem which seems most acute.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)). Thus, the district court properly dismissed plaintiffs’ claim under the Equal Protection Clause.”
Affirmed