By: Derek Hawkins//May 31, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Alberto Martinez, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
Case No.: 15-2752; 15-3410
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and POSNER and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Lawyer Sanction
District court did not abuse discretion in issuing sanctions to attorney to obstructed discovery demands.
“The significance of the order, as far as McClellan is concerned, is not the price tag but the sharp criticisms of her in the order, and those criticisms were apt and accurate. The plaintiffs had been strung along by McClellan and others at the State’s Attorney’s Office for more than a year, having been incorrectly informed that the Office had not retained the plaintiffs’ criminal case files. McClellan had repeatedly denied that the files existed, without knowing whether they did or did not exist and without conducting a reasonable inquiry into the matter. She had even threatened the plaintiffs’ counsel that she would seek sanctions against him if he continued to request the documents in the face of her denial of their existence. She also tried to prevent him from searching for the files himself. And when the files were finally located she delayed turning them over by advancing a meritless claim of privilege. It took multiple court orders and more than a year of effort for the plaintiffs to obtain all the documents to which they were entitled. The district court did not abuse its discretion in sanctioning her.”
Affirmed