By: Derek Hawkins//February 29, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: United States of America v. Charles Robinson, IV
Case No.: 15-2091
Officials: POSNER, EASTERBROOK, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Sentencing
Judge improperly makes sentences consecutive when amending sentence of appellant to fit with new guidelines.
“What Amendment 782 would not have allowed the judge to do would have been to reconsider any feature of the original sentence that he had imposed other than its length, such as whether the defendant qualified as a career offender. United States v. Wren, 706 F.3d 861 (7th Cir. 2013). But the change in the applicable guideline provision empowered the judge to invoke U.S.S.G. § 5G1.2(c) and make the three sentences concurrent rather than consecutive. Unfortunately, but not irrevocably, the defendant’s lawyer had misinformed the judge that the three sentences had to run consecutively. In fact they could be made concurrent; and if so, since the longest sentence was 30 years, that would be the defendant’s total sentence.”
Reversed and Remanded