By: Derek Hawkins//February 22, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Bathusi Musa v. Loretta E. Lynch
Case No.: 15-2046
Officials: BAUER, POSNER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Immigration – Application for Asylum
Foreign national request for asylum not granted where fear of facing genital mutilation upon return to native Botswana
“Although we vacate and remand the decision regarding withholding of removal, we agree with the Board that Musa is not entitled to relief under the Convention Against Torture. The implementing regulations define torture as “severe pain or suffering … inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official.” 8C.F.R. §208.18. Female genital mutilation is torture, of course. But the judge did not err by finding that Musa failed to show that torture is likely to be carried out by or with the acquiescence of the government in Botswana. See Khan v. Holder, 766 F.3d 689, 698 (7th Cir. 2014); Ishitiaq v. Holder, 578 F.3d 712, 718 n.3 (7th Cir. 2009); 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.16(c)(2), 1208.18(a)(1). The judge justifiably discounted Selawe’s testimony and was unswayed by Musa’s, and Musa has not pointed to evidence in the record to substantiate her testimony that the government would have permitted her family to subject her to FGM even if she had reported their attempts in 2002 and 2003.”
Petition for Asylum Dismissed
Petition for protection under Convention Against Torture Denied
Petition for Withholding of Removal Granted