By: Derek Hawkins//September 9, 2015//
Civil
WI Court of Appeals – District III
Officials: Stark, P.J., Hruz, J., and Thomas Cane, Reserve Judge
Adverse Possession – Permissive Use
2014AP1854 Randall A Hattamer v. Northern States Power Company
On appeal, the Hattamers appear to argue that the area of permissive use that Northern States historically granted to owners of the Hattamers’ property was, in fact, a small distance south of the location of parties’ property boundary, which the circuit court concluded had not changed since 1950. We conclude the circuit court’s finding that the parties’ property line had not changed since 1950 was not clearly erroneous. We further conclude that the circuit court, in construing various documents authorizing the Hattamers’ and their predecessors’ permissive use, did not err when it interpreted those documents—consistent with its factual finding regarding the property line—as including use of Northern States’ land up to that property line. Finally, the Hattamers have not shown the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied their motion for reconsideration. We affirm.
Decision
Affirmed