By: Derek Hawkins//August 19, 2015//
Civil
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Officials: KANNE and ROVNER, Circuit Judges, and SPRINGMANN, District Judge.
Fair Credit Reporting Act – Standing
No. 15-1150 Erica Tierney v. Advocate Health and Hospitals
Appellants failure to prove that respondent-appellant met definition of a “consumer reporting agency” meant FCRA claims did not apply.
“Nevertheless, the plaintiffs take another shot at fitting Advocate within the definition of “consumer reporting agency.” In an effort to meet the first prong of the definition, they claim that Advocate assembles and shares its patients’ data “on a cooperative nonprofit basis,” even if not for fees. 15 U.S.C. §1681a(f) (emphasis added). Specifically, the com‐ plaint alleges that “Advocate, through Advocate Physician Partners, collects, manages, and shares a multitude of patient information … in a variety of ways.” It then lists several examples: programs to improve health care quality and efficiency; a Medicare savings program; a “shared savings con‐ tract with its biggest commercial insurance partner”; and the hiring of “outpatient care managers.” There is no allegation that these programs involve cooperative sharing of information with third parties. Judging by the allegations, these are internal Advocate programs, with the possible exception of the insurance contract. Nor is there any claim that these programs operate on a non‐profit basis. Even drawing reasonable inferences in the plaintiffs’ favor, we think these al‐ legations are too thin.”
Affirmed.