By: Derek Hawkins//August 19, 2015//
Civil
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and CUDAHY and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges
Counterclaim Dismissal
No. 14-3075 Firestone Financial Corp. v. John R. Meyer
District court fails to explain why appellant’s counterclaims were insufficient to preclude summary judgment.
“In awarding summary judgment, the district court did not specifically discuss either of these defenses. Rather, at the hearing on Firestone’s motion, the court simply stated that none of the arguments “advanced by Mr. Meyer really undercut the entitlement of Firestone to summary judgment” and that the court did not “see any need … to expend time and effort for purposes of knocking out the arguments advanced by Mr. Meyer.” Likewise, the court’s subsequent judgment order simply stated that the court had “reviewed all memoranda and related documents filed by the parties and [had] orally expressed its conclusion that Meyer [had] not met his burden of proving his affirmative defenses.””
Reversed and Remanded