Free Newsletter
State Supreme Court revokes attorney’s license
Jack Zemlicka, [email protected]//October 5, 2011//
The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Tuesday revoked attorney Craig Hunt’s law license.
The discipline was a reciprocal action following the California Supreme Court’s disbarment of Hunt in 2007.
Hunt graduated from the University of Wisconsin Law School in 1964, passed the California Bar in 1971 and practiced in that state.
He let his Wisconsin bar dues lapse and in 1974 was suspended by the Wisconsin Supreme Court, according to the order.
According to the Wisconsin court’s revocation order, Hunt’s California revocation stemmed from engaging in the unauthorized practice of law, moral turpitude and violations of the conditions of his probation related to prior discipline imposed by the Supreme Court of California.
Both Hunt and the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation stipulated to the revocation and no costs were assessed.
Related Content
Polls
Loading ...Legal Tech
- How ransomware tactics against law firms are changing
- How large language models are leveling the personal injury playing field
- Attorney Share, Lawmatics integrate to automate law firm referrals
Legal News
- Wisconsin Legal 250 launches
- Lawsuit challenges Wisconsin absentee ballot guidance
- DOJ sues Milwaukee over police mask ordinance
- Chippewa DA questions sheriff’s credibility before primary
- State seeks suspension of Hannah Dugan’s law license
- Judge dismisses Wisconsin wake surfing lawsuit
- Wisconsin pilots online domestic abuse filing portal
Case Digests
- Informed Consent-Statutory Standing
- Zoning and Property Rights-Rental Restrictions
- Ineffective Assistance of Counsel-Evidence Omission
- Plain Error-Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- Revocation Sentencing -Sentencing Factors
- Tax Claim Classification-Tax Sale Claims
- Race Discrimination-Employment Retaliation
- First Amendment-Pickering Balancing Test
- Procedural Reasonableness-Federal Sentencing Discretion
- Federal Officer Removal Statute-Climate Change Litigation
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act-Class Action
- Age Discrimination Employment Act-Sufficiency of Evidence
