02-0377-CR State v. Bell

By: dmc-admin//February 10, 2003//

Listen to this article

Jaamal D. Bell appeals from a judgment of conviction of second-degree sexual assault as a habitual offender and from an order denying his motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. He argues that phone records indicating that the victim called him in the days following the assault and a hotel receipt corroborating his testimony about his activity the night following the assault would have changed the result of his trial. We reject his claim that the real controversy was not fully tried and that newly discovered evidence requires a new trial.

We affirm the judgment and order.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Racine County, Marik, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: James L. Fullin, Madison

For Respondent: Robert S. Flancher, Racine; Jennifer E. Nashold, Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event