Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

02-0263-CR State v. McPhetridge

By: dmc-admin//January 20, 2003//

02-0263-CR State v. McPhetridge

By: dmc-admin//January 20, 2003//

Listen to this article

Thomas McPhetridge appeals pro se from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of first-degree sexual assault of a child. He also appeals from the orders denying his postconviction motions. McPhetridge claims: (1) the trial court allowed improper impeachment evidence; (2) the prosecution failed to turn over exculpatory evidence; (3) his trial counsel was ineffective; (4) the trial court improperly instructed the jury; (5) the trial court erred in failing to hold a Machner evidentiary hearing; (6) his sentence was based on incorrect information; and (7) the trial transcripts have been altered and are incorrect.

We disagree with all of these contentions and affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Konkol, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Thomas McPhetridge, Black River Falls

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; Maura F.J. Whelan, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests