Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-2379 Lobenstein, et al. v. American Family Insurance, et al.

By: dmc-admin//November 25, 2002//

01-2379 Lobenstein, et al. v. American Family Insurance, et al.

By: dmc-admin//November 25, 2002//

Listen to this article

American Family Mutual Insurance Company appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiffs $135,000 in damages for injuries resulting from a car accident between plaintiff, Jack Lobenstein, and Lucille Cassidy, who was insured by American Family. American Family makes six claims: (1) the trial court erred by denying its motion for summary judgment; (2) the trial court erred by excluding evidence concerning possible alternate explanations of the collision; (3) the trial court erred by refusing to give a curative instruction when the Lobensteins’ counsel reversed the burden of proof during closing argument; (4) the conduct of the Lobensteins’ counsel prejudiced the jury, requiring a new trial; (5) the damage award was perverse requiring either remittitur or a new trial; and (6) the totality of errors requires a new trial in the interest of justice.

We reject these claims and affirm.

Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist IV, Marquette County, Wright, J., Dykman, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Michael P. Crooks, Madison; Patricia J. Epstein, Madison

For Respondent: Robert G. LeBell, Milwaukee; Richard L. Moncada, Milwaukee

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests