By: dmc-admin//June 25, 2002//
By: dmc-admin//June 25, 2002//
Brian T. appeals an order setting the amount of child support for each of his five children. He argues that: (1) strict application of the percentage of income standards is unfair; (2) strict application of the percentage of income standards here conflicts with the Consumer Credit Protection Act; (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by strictly applying the percentage of income standards because the order leaves Brian with an income below the federal poverty level; and (4) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by issuing a child support order with which Brian cannot possibly comply. We conclude that the court erroneously exercised its discretion when it set a child support obligation that Brian indisputably cannot meet.
We therefore reverse and remand.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist III, Barron County, Brunner, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: R. Jeffrey Burgfechtel, Menomonie
For Respondent: John M. Muench, Barron