Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-3121, 01-3122, 01-3123, 01-3124, 01-3125 In Re the Paternity of Jared D.B., Hunter W., Kimberly L.N., Kayla L.H., Tanner D.F.: Barron County, Brenda F. v. Brian T.

By: dmc-admin//June 25, 2002//

01-3121, 01-3122, 01-3123, 01-3124, 01-3125 In Re the Paternity of Jared D.B., Hunter W., Kimberly L.N., Kayla L.H., Tanner D.F.: Barron County, Brenda F. v. Brian T.

By: dmc-admin//June 25, 2002//

Listen to this article

Brian T. appeals an order setting the amount of child support for each of his five children. He argues that: (1) strict application of the percentage of income standards is unfair; (2) strict application of the percentage of income standards here conflicts with the Consumer Credit Protection Act; (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by strictly applying the percentage of income standards because the order leaves Brian with an income below the federal poverty level; and (4) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by issuing a child support order with which Brian cannot possibly comply. We conclude that the court erroneously exercised its discretion when it set a child support obligation that Brian indisputably cannot meet.

We therefore reverse and remand.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Barron County, Brunner, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: R. Jeffrey Burgfechtel, Menomonie

For Respondent: John M. Muench, Barron

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests