Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-1422 B & P Drywall, et al. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission, et al.

By: dmc-admin//May 13, 2002//

01-1422 B & P Drywall, et al. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission, et al.

By: dmc-admin//May 13, 2002//

Listen to this article

B & P Drywall and its insurer appeal a judgment affirming a decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission that determined Stanley James was an employee, not an independent contractor, at the time he fractured his heels, and that his compensation should be based on his average weekly wage of $700. B & P argues that James met the nine-part test for independent contractors set out in Wis. Stat. sec. 102.07(8)(b) (1999-2000) as a matter of law, and that James’s compensation should be based on “the usual going earnings in James’s field” rather than his actual average earnings.

We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Menominee County, Schmidt, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Jeffrey J. Strande, Wausau

For Respondent: Lowell E. Nass, Madison; Stuart J. Spaude, Appleton

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests