Home / Case Digests / 01-1311 State v. Haines

01-1311 State v. Haines

There is no ex post facto violation in applying the amended limitation period to defendant because, on its face, the amendment did not remove a defense that was available to defendant in 1992. "Indeed, such 'defense' would not have been available until 1999, when the former statute of limitations would have run."Although no Wisconsin case ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *