Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-2095 Hilt-Dyson v. City of Chicago

By: dmc-admin//March 4, 2002//

01-2095 Hilt-Dyson v. City of Chicago

By: dmc-admin//March 4, 2002//

Listen to this article

“Despite Ms. Hilt-Dyson’s subjective perceptions concerning ERPS, an objective person would not view her work environment as hostile or abusive. In particular, the back rubbing incidents at issue in this case, although inappropriate behavior in the workplace, do not constitute by themselves actionable harassment under Title VII. Sutherland, her supervisor, rubbed her back on two occasions in March 1999. On each occasion, the back rubbing incident was brief and involved no threats, intimidation or humiliation. Moreover, upon learning that this conduct troubled Ms. Hilt-Dyson, Sutherland told her that he would not touch her again. Indeed, the parties agree that Sutherland never touched nor attempted to touch Ms. Hilt- Dyson after the second back rubbing incident. Given these circumstances, the back rubbing incidents did not constitute actionable sexual harassment under Title VII.”

Affirmed.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Holderman, J., Ripple, J.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests