Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-3210 Stone v. City of Indianapolis Public Utilities Division, et al.

By: dmc-admin//February 25, 2002//

01-3210 Stone v. City of Indianapolis Public Utilities Division, et al.

By: dmc-admin//February 25, 2002//

Listen to this article

“The second route to summary judgment, the adaptation of McDonnell Douglas to the retaliation context, requires the plaintiff to show that after filing the charge only he, and not any similarly situated employee who did not file a charge, was subjected to an adverse employment action even though he was performing his job in a satisfactory manner. If the defendant presents no evidence in response, the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment. If the defendant presents unrebutted evidence of a noninvidious reason for the adverse action, he is entitled to summary judgment. Otherwise there must be a trial.”

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Hamilton, J., Posner, J.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests