Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-0877-CR State v. Massey

By: dmc-admin//February 18, 2002//

01-0877-CR State v. Massey

By: dmc-admin//February 18, 2002//

Listen to this article

Airry Massey appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after he pled guilty to one count of felony murder, as a party to a crime. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing, or in the alternative, to modify his sentence. Massey claims that: (1) the trial court violated his due-process right to be sentenced on accurate information when it relied on information in an allegedly undisclosed sentencing memorandum; (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion when it based Massey’s sentence on the information in the undisclosed sentencing memorandum; and (3) his due-process right to be sentenced on accurate information was violated when the State and a co-defendant’s attorney allegedly withheld information regarding the co-defendant’s credibility from the sentencing court.

We affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist I, Milwaukee County, DiMotto, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Richard L. Kaiser, Milwaukee

For Respondent: Robert D. Donohoo, Milwaukee; Mary E. Burke, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests