Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-0937-CR, 01-0938-CR State v. Meyer

By: dmc-admin//January 21, 2002//

01-0937-CR, 01-0938-CR State v. Meyer

By: dmc-admin//January 21, 2002//

Listen to this article

Douglas Meyer appeals a judgment convicting him on his guilty pleas of retail theft as a repeater in Pierce County and possession of burglary tools as a repeater in St. Croix County. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Meyer argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas or be resentenced because: (1) the State did not follow the procedure set out in Wis. Stat. sec. 971.091 when it consolidated the cases from two counties; (2) the repeater allegations were not properly pled or proved and Meyer’s counsel was ineffective for agreeing to amend the defective information; (3) the trial court failed to warn Meyer that the court did not have to impose the sentence recommended by the parties under the plea agreement; and (4) Meyer’s trial counsel was ineffective for her failure to review the presentence investigation report before the sentencing hearing.

We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment and order.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Pierce County, Wing, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Peter J. Morin, Menomonie

For Respondent: P. Phillip Peterson, Madison; John M. O’Boyle, Ellsworth

Polls

Should Wisconsin Supreme Court rules be amended so attorneys can't appeal license revocation after 5 years?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests