Quantcast
Home / Case Digests / 00-1203 Clay, et al. v. Johnson, et al.

00-1203 Clay, et al. v. Johnson, et al.

"The district court believed that the position the Board announced in its proposed version of Comment 18(g)-4 was patently inconsistent with the position the Board announced in the adopted version of Comment 18(g)-4. The court noted that the Board initially indicated in its proposed comment that the '30 days from' language was not sufficient to ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*