Quantcast
Home / Case Digests / 01-0087 Stensland v. Warshafsky, Rotter, Tarnoff, Reinhardt and Bloch, S.C.

01-0087 Stensland v. Warshafsky, Rotter, Tarnoff, Reinhardt and Bloch, S.C.

Liduvina Stensland appeals from the trial court's summary judgment dismissing her legal malpractice action against Warshafsky, Rotter, Tarnoff, Reinhardt and Bloch, S.C. She claims that the court erred in concluding that issue preclusion barred her claim. Liduvina raises two issues: (1) whether judicial estoppel is applicable; and (2) whether issue preclusion was proper. Because judicial ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*