00-0628 State v. Schultz

By: dmc-admin//July 23, 2001//

Listen to this article

Joseph Schultz appeals a judgment declaring his bar a nuisance. He also appeals an order of abatement enjoining him from operating the bar. Schultz argues that: (1) he was denied actual notice of the conduct upon which the judgment was based; (2) the nuisance claim is subject to a 60-day statute of limitations thus barring the claim; and (3) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by refusing to permit Schultz to post an undertaking to avoid closure of the business. We disagree and affirm the order. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist III, Barron County, Eaton, J., Peterson, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Randall D.B. Tigue, Minneapolis, MN; Rodney S. Sunderland, Rice Lake

For Respondent: James C. Babler, Barron; John J. Glinski, Madison

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event