Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Constitutional Law – Supremacy clause

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 31, 2015//

Constitutional Law – Supremacy clause

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 31, 2015//

Listen to this article

U.S. Supreme Court

Civil

Constitutional Law – Supremacy clause

The Supremacy Clause does not confer a private right of action, and Medicaid providers cannot sue for an injunction requiring compliance with §30(a) of the Medicaid Act.

The Supremacy Clause instructs courts to give federal law priority when state and federal law clash. Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 210. But it is not the “ ‘source of any federal rights,’ ”
Golden State Transit Corp. v. Los Angeles, 493 U. S. 103, 107, and certainly does not create a cause of action. Nothing in the Clause’s text suggests otherwise, and nothing suggests it was
ever understood as conferring a private right of action. Article I vests Congress with broad discretion over the manner of implementing its enumerated powers. Art I., §8; McCulloch v.
Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 421. It is unlikely that the Constitution gave Congress broad discretion with regard to the enactment of laws, while simultaneously limiting Congress’s power over
the manner of their implementation, making it impossible to leave the enforcement of federal law to federal actors.

567 Fed. Appx. 496, reversed.

14-15 Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc.

Scalia, J.; Breyer, J., concurring; Sotomayor, J., dissenting.

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests