Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sentencing – repeater enhancement

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 21, 2015//

Sentencing – repeater enhancement

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 21, 2015//

Listen to this article

Wisconsin Court of Appeals

Criminal

Sentencing – repeater enhancement

APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Lincoln County: ROBERT RUSSELL, Judge. Affirmed.

PER CURIAM. David King appeals an order denying his motion to reduce his sentence by vacating the portion of the sentence attributable to the repeater enhancement. He argues: (1) the court failed to make a finding that he was a repeat offender; (2) the presentence investigation report (PSI) was not adequate to prove his repeater status because it lacked sufficient specificity necessary to constitute a reliable government report; (3) the PSI lacked specificity regarding the dates of prior conviction and incarceration; and (4) King was denied his due process right to challenge the evidence of his repeater status. We reject these arguments and affirm the order.

DISTRICT III; Lincoln County; ROBERT RUSSELL; Hoover, P.J., Stark and Hruz, JJ.

2014AP001133-CR State v. David A. King

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests