By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 25, 2014//
Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Criminal
Criminal Procedure — successive appeals
Lloyd T. Schuenke, pro se, appeals from an order denying his postconviction motions for relief in cases from 1991, 2007, and 2008. The circuit court explained that, with respect to the 1991 case, the motion was barred both because of State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), and because Schuenke’s 1991 sentence had expired. The motions in the 2007 and 2008 cases were denied because they were predicated on invalidation of the 1991 conviction. We affirm. This opinion shall not be published.
2013AP469, 2013AP470, 2013AP471 State v. Schuenke
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Wagner, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Schuenke, Lloyd T., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Remington, Christine A., Milwaukee