Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Constitutional Law – preemption — voting

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 17, 2013//

Constitutional Law – preemption — voting

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 17, 2013//

Listen to this article

U.S. Supreme Court

Civil

Constitutional Law – preemption — voting

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 preempts state laws requiring proof of citizenship to vote.

Arizona’s appeal to the presumption against pre-emption invoked in this Court’s Supremacy Clause cases is inapposite. The power the Elections Clause confers is none other than the power to pre-empt. Because Congress, when it acts under this Clause, is always on notice that its legislation will displace some element of a pre-existing legal regime erected by the States, the reasonable assumption is that the text of Elections Clause legislation accurately communicates the scope of Congress’s pre-emptive intent.

Nonetheless, while the NVRA forbids States to demand that an applicant submit additional information beyond that required by the Federal Form, it does not preclude States from “deny[ing] registration based on information in their possession establishing the applicant’s ineligibility.”

677 F. 3d 383, affirmed.

12-71 Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.

Scalia, J.; Kennedy, J., concurring; Thomas, J., dissenting; Alito, J., dissenting.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests