Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Criminal Procedure — immunity

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 30, 2012//

Criminal Procedure — immunity

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 30, 2012//

Listen to this article

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Criminal

Criminal Procedure — immunity

Even though a conspirator thought his cooperation with state authorities gave him absolute immunity, his statements are admissible in federal court.  “The district court properly denied the suppression motion. Stadfeld’s statements were not the product of law-enforcement coercion, and the erroneous advice from his lawyers did not make his statements involuntary or inadmissible based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Moreover, to the extent that Stadfeld thought he had a comprehensive immunity agreement, it was conditioned on his telling the truth, and his failure to do so was a breach.”

Affirmed.

11-1369 U.S. v. Stadfeld

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, Crabb, J., Sykes, J.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests