New trials; newly discovered evidence
Charles J. Homesley appeals from a judgment of conviction for three counts of second-degree sexual assault with threat of force and one count of false imprisonment and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal that he is entitled to a new trial because of newly discovered evidence. We conclude that Homesley did not establish that he was entitled to a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, and we affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP2013-CR State v. Homesley
Dist IV, Dane County, Fiedler, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Findley, Brian C., Darlington; For Respondent: Kaiser, Robert J., Jr., Madison; Sanders, Michael C., Madison