2010AP2013-CR State v. Homesley

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//July 21, 2011//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
New trials; newly discovered evidence

Charles J. Homesley appeals from a judgment of conviction for three counts of second-degree sexual assault with threat of force and one count of false imprisonment and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal that he is entitled to a new trial because of newly discovered evidence. We conclude that Homesley did not establish that he was entitled to a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, and we affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP2013-CR State v. Homesley

Dist IV, Dane County, Fiedler, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Findley, Brian C., Darlington; For Respondent: Kaiser, Robert J., Jr., Madison; Sanders, Michael C., Madison

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event