Quantcast

Malpractice insurance: How to look good for an underwriter (access required)

POSTED: Thursday, August 9th, 2012 at 1:11 pm

BY: DOLAN MEDIA NEWSWIRES

While legal malpractice insurance is a necessity, overpaying for it is not. One key to getting the best rate for legal malpractice insurance is showing the insurance underwriter a law practice that’s set up to be low-risk.

Insurance – Reformation (access required)

POSTED: Thursday, April 12th, 2012 at 9:51 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

2011AP1487 Palkowski v. Acuity

Insurance – Reformation (access required)

POSTED: Wednesday, April 11th, 2012 at 10:46 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

2011AP1487 Palkowski v. Acuity

Insurance doesn’t cover bat guano nightmare, says Wis. Supreme Court (access required)

POSTED: Thursday, March 15th, 2012 at 12:16 pm

BY: Pat Murphy, Dolan Media Newswires

A Wisconsin couple learned in 2007 that their vacation home had been rendered uninhabitable because of bat guano that had piled up in the walls. Last week, the state supreme court compounded their troubles by deciding that the loss wasn’t covered by their insurance.

THE DARK SIDE: Reality matters, not perception

POSTED: Tuesday, February 21st, 2012 at 11:49 am

BY: David Ziemer, david.ziemer@wislawjournal.com

From time to time, I hear people say something like, “It’s not only important the judicial system be fair; it is important the judicial system be perceived as fair.”

LAWBIZ COACHES CORNER: Fee-suit exclusions muddy malpractice waters

POSTED: Friday, January 13th, 2012 at 2:44 pm

BY: ED POLL

The cost of malpractice insurance is an issue for every lawyer.

LAWBIZ COACHES CORNER: Are you excluded from malpractice insurance coverage?

POSTED: Thursday, December 22nd, 2011 at 10:02 am

BY: ED POLL

The cost of malpractice insurance is an issue for every lawyer. Annual malpractice premiums cost thousands of dollars, often straining the ability of small firms and sole practitioners to purchase when premiums approach 10 percent or more of their income on a product they likely will never need.

Insurance; Bad faith (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, November 29th, 2011 at 1:22 pm

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

2011AP42 Winter v. Seneca, Sigel Mut. Ins. Co.

Insurance – subrogation — offsets (access required)

2010AP2435 Peterson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, et al.

Insurance — statute of limitations (access required)

2011AP167 Elliott v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin

Supreme Court seeks to clarify insurance exclusions (access required)

POSTED: Monday, October 24th, 2011 at 9:00 am

BY: David Ziemer, david.ziemer@wislawjournal.com

Two cases pending in the Wisconsin Supreme Court this term should clarify the meanings of two common exclusions in insurance policies: pollution exclusions in homeowner policies and motorized vehicle exclusions in farm policies.

Insurance – Coverage – property damage (access required)

2010AP1835 The Selmer Company v. Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina, et al.

2010AP2620 Geiger v. Coleman Engineering Company, et al. (access required)

Insurance
Title insurance; duty to defend

2010AP364 Rebholz, et al. v. Lakeland Leisure Corporation, et al. (access required)

Insurance
Releases; extrinsic evidence

10-3015 Universal Mortgage Corp. v. Wurttembergische Versigherung AG (access required)

Insurance Bankers bonds; Employee misconduct When an insured incurs liability to a third party — whether in contract or tort — as a result of employee misconduct, financial loss resulting from that liability is not “directly” caused by the employee misconduct and therefore is not covered by fidelity bonds containing direct-loss language. “The particular bond [...]

10-3898 & 11-1006 Weitzenkamp v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of America (access required)

Insurance ERISA; self-reported symptoms limitation The failure to include a self-reported symptoms limitation in the summary plan description (“SPD”) prevents an ERISA plan from relying on it to discontinue benefits. “Here, the SPD clearly sets out that long-term benefits will be discontinued after twenty-four months if a participant’s disability is due to mental illness or [...]

2009AP1558 Steffens v. BlueCross BlueShield of Illinois (access required)

POSTED: Friday, July 8th, 2011 at 11:22 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Insurance
ERISA

2010AP1773 Blumenfeld v. Jeans (access required)

POSTED: Wednesday, June 29th, 2011 at 10:34 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Insurance
Subrogation; collateral source rule

2008AP2595 Brethorst v. Allstate Property & Casualty Ins. Co. (access required)

Insurance Bad faith An insured may file a bad faith claim without also filing a breach of contract claim. “[W]hile Jones held that a bad faith claim need not be accompanied by a breach of contract claim, it did not hold that a first-party bad faith claim need not be accompanied by a breach of [...]

10-2112 Jackman Financial Corp. v. Humana Ins. Co. (access required)

POSTED: Tuesday, May 31st, 2011 at 11:58 am

BY: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF

Insurance ERISA; facility-of-payment clauses Where a life insurance policy contained a facility-of-payment clause, it did not violate ERISA for the insurer to pay the proceeds to the insured’s children. “Under the arbitrary and capricious standard, we overturn the administrator’s decision only where there is an absence of reasoning to support it. See Hess v. Reg-Ellen [...]

2009AP001422 Siebert v. Wisconsin American Mutual Ins. Co. (access required)

Insurance Automobile policies; negligent entrustment An insurer is not liable for its insureds’ negligent entrustment of a vehicle if the driver was not negligent in his operation of the vehicle. “Bankert and Malone teach us that there is no coverage for Koehler’s alleged negligent entrustment of the vehicle to Raddatz because that act is not [...]

Copyright © 2013, The Daily Reporter Publishing Co., 225 E. Michigan St., Suite 540, Milwaukee, WI 53202