By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 28, 2010//
Sentencing
DNA surcharge
Earnest M. Moffett appeals from an amended judgment of conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and possession with intent to deliver 200-1000 grams of marijuana, second or subsequent offense, as a party to the crime, contrary to §§ 941.29(2)(a), 961.41(1m)(h)2., 961.48 and 939.05 (2007-08),[1] and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Moffett presents a single issue on appeal: whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it imposed a DNA surcharge. We affirm.
This opinion will not be published.
2010AP507-CR State v. Moffett
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Konkol, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Hintze, Donna L., Madison; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Remington, Christine A., Madison