Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP666-CR State v. Kratz

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 16, 2010//

2010AP666-CR State v. Kratz

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 16, 2010//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Plea withdrawal

Troy M. Kratz appeals from a judgment of conviction for battery causing great bodily harm as a party to a crime and as a repeat offender, and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the circuit court erred because the State did not prove the convictions that led to the penalty enhancer for being a repeat offender. We conclude that under the totality of the circumstances the record demonstrates that Kratz understood all of the consequences of his plea. We therefore affirm the judgment and order. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP666-CR State v. Kratz

Dist IV, Columbia County, White, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Lichstein, Byron C., Madison; For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Madison; Hoffman, Linda, Portage

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests