2010AP365 Brunswick Corporation v. Sentry Insurance

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 10, 2010//

Listen to this article

Insurance
Environmental remediation

Brunswick Corporation appeals from a judgment declaring that Sentry Insurance does not owe coverage for sums Brunswick expended in the cleanup of Hamilton Pond. Brunswick argues disputed issues of fact exist as to whether the cleanup was part of addressing private party claims for which Sentry owes coverage. We affirm the circuit court’s summary judgment determination because the cleanup was part of environmental remediation required by the government and the parties previously stipulated that Sentry did not provide coverage for the cost of government required remediation. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP365 Brunswick Corporation v. Sentry Insurance

Dist II, Ozaukee County, Williams, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Clark, James R., Milwaukee; Bargren, Paul, Milwaukee; Spitz, Katherine D., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Tyndall, Susan R., Waukesha

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event