By: Derek Hawkins//August 2, 2017//
WI Court of Appeals – District IV
Case Name: Lamonte Hayes, a minor, by David P. Lowe, his Guardian Ad Litem v. Rebecca A. Thousand, M.D., et al.
Case No.: 2016AP1761
Officials: Kloppenburg, P.J., Sherman and Blanchard, JJ
Focus: Court Error – Testimony
Lamonte Haynes appeals the judgment and order of the circuit court denying him a new trial in this labor and delivery medical malpractice case. Haynes argues that during the course of trial, the circuit court erred in four respects: (1) overruling Haynes’s objection to remarks defense counsel made during closing argument that allegedly misstated the law and confused the jury; (2) overruling Haynes’s objections to alleged new opinion testimony by the defendant, Dr. Rebecca Thousand, and limiting Haynes’s cross examination of Thousand; (3) overruling Haynes’s objections to alleged new opinion testimony from defense experts Dr. Sean Blackwell and Dr. Terrie Inder; and (4) overruling Haynes’s objection to alleged hearsay testimony by defense expert Dr. Robert Zimmerman. Haynes argues that these alleged errors were prejudicial to his case and that this court should grant him a new trial. We conclude that the circuit court did not err as to defense counsel’s closing argument remarks, Thousand’s testimony, or Blackwell’s and Inder’s testimony, and that any error as to Zimmerman’s testimony was harmless. Therefore, we affirm.