By: Derek Hawkins//August 22, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: United States of America v. Dominic Miller
Case No.: 15-2856
Officials: BAUER, FLAUM, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges
Focus: Sentencing
Sentence imposed was not unreasonable given appellants history of drug use and drug sales.
“We find that the district judge did not err in her burden‐ shifting analysis. The judge began by stating that “the probation office was correct in determining that Mr. Miller’s relevant conduct involved at least 500 grams but less than 1.5 kilograms.” She referenced the relevant time period and the three‐to‐five pound range that Wagner had noted in her inter‐ view with law enforcement. Only after that did the district judge say she was “convinced that defendant has not shown that his relevant conduct involved less than 500 grams.” In short, the judge found that (i) the government satisfied its initial burden regarding the reliability of the revised PSR’s drug‐quantity determination, and (ii) Miller did not satisfy his burden when it shifted to him. Miller argues that he did in fact satisfy his burden, but we disagree. Miller emphasizes that in his rebuttal to the initial PSR, he demonstrated that he did not purchase and sell most of the methamphetamine by himself. As noted above, however, that potential fact is irrelevant since Miller and Wagner were jointly engaged in a criminal activity.”
Affirmed