By: Derek Hawkins//June 28, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Jaded Mahelet Ruvalcaba Martinez v. Peter Valdez Cahue
Case No.: 16-1609
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and BAUER and FLAUM, Circuit Judges.
Focus: International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Respondent’s failure to return child to Mexico to parent with legal custody of the child was improper.
“Martinez’s initial decision to move A.M. to Mexico was lawful: she had sole custody over A.M. under Illinois law, and neither Illinois law nor the Convention precluded her from moving with her son to Mexico with or without Cahue’s permission. Cahue had no rights of custody over A.M. that qualified Martinez’s position. Once in Mexico, A.M. adapted readily to his new home, such that by August 2014, when his father refused to return him, he was being kept from his habitual residence. Cahue retained A.M. in violation of Martinez’s rights of custody under Mexican law—rights that she exercised continuously. Cahue’s retention of A.M. was therefore wrongful under the Convention. Finally, applying a defense here would not serve the aims of the convention.”
Reversed with order to return child to Mexico