By: Derek Hawkins//December 1, 2015//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case No.: 15-1269
Case Name: Mid-Central Illinois Regional v. Con-Tech Carpentry, LLC
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and POSNER and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges
Pertinent Practice Areas: Employment Law – ERISA – Delinquent Contributions
Defendant-Respondent failure to respond to pleadings results in default judgment. Judge did not abuse discretion.
“Con-Tech filed a Rule 60(b) motion on January 15. The motion also invoked Rule 55(c), but too late. Con-Tech told the district judge that it had not ignored the suit but had instead started negotiating with plaintiffs’ lawyers, seeking a satisfactory settlement. The judge replied that Con-Tech may not have ignored the plaintiffs’ demands, but that it had ignored the litigation. The judge observed that it is impossible to handle a suit in which a litigant unilaterally decides to march to the beat of its own drum. A defendant can both file an answer and try to negotiate a settlement; doing the latter does not eliminate the need to do the former. The judge denied the Rule 60(b) motion, and Con-Tech appealed.”
Affirmed