Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Sufficiency of Evidence – Injunction

By: Derek Hawkins//October 6, 2015//

Sufficiency of Evidence – Injunction

By: Derek Hawkins//October 6, 2015//

Listen to this article

Civil

WI Court of Appeals – District I

Officials: Curley, P.J., Kessler and Brennan, JJ.

Sufficiency of Evidence – Injunction

2015AP77 Alan L. Keltner v. Daniel Joseph Miller

Daniel Joseph Miller appeals from an order granting Alan L. Keltner a harassment injunction against Miller. Miller challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and the circuit court’s findings of fact, as well as its conclusion that “Miller’s conduct constituted harassment that could be properly enjoined under [WIS. STAT.] § 813.125” (2013-14). Miller also argues that the injunction “effectively prevents [Miller] from exercising his First Amendment rights,” “constitutes an impermissible prior restraint on speech,” and is “excessively broad.” We reject Miller’s arguments and affirm the order.

Decision

Affirmed. Per Curiam.

Full Text


Attorney Derek A. Hawkins is the managing partner at Hawkins Law Offices LLC, where he heads up the firm’s startup law practice. He specializes in business formation, corporate governance, intellectual property protection, private equity and venture capital funding and mergers & acquisitions. Check out the website at www.hawkins-lawoffices.com or contact them at 262-737-8825.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests