By: dmc-admin//January 2, 2007//
Eddie S. Powe appeals from a reconfinement order and a related postconviction order. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing a reconfinement period that exceeded all of the recommendations. We conclude that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in determining the reconfinement period, and that the postconviction court demonstrated the trial court’s exercise of discretion along with its own when denying Powe’s postconviction motion. Therefore, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Dugan, Kahn, JJ., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Martin, Richard D., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Donohoo, Robert D., Milwaukee; Campbell, Shunette T., Madison