By: Derek Hawkins//May 9, 2017//
WI Court of Appeals – District III
Case Name: State of Wisconsin v. Christopher M. Gibson
Case No.: 2016AP1003-CR
Officials: Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ.
Focus: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
Christopher Gibson appeals a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Gibson argues: (1) the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by giving a falsus in uno jury instruction over defense counsel’s objection; and (2) his trial counsel
was ineffective by questioning Gibson about prior bad acts, failing to object to the State’s subsequent introduction of other acts evidence, and failing to request a limiting instruction regarding the other acts evidence. We conclude the circuit court did not err by giving a falsus in uno jury instruction. We further conclude Gibson was not prejudiced by counsel’s alleged deficiencies. We therefore affirm.