By: Derek Hawkins//October 5, 2016//
WI Court of Appeals – District IV
Case Name: Jessica Pierce, et al v. Mid-Century Insurance Company, et al
Case No.: 2015AP2408
Officials: Lundsten, Sherman and Blanchard, JJ
Focus: Insurance Policy – Coverage – Underinsured Motorist Coverage
This appeal relates to the enforceability of an automobile insurance policy provision that is part of the policy’s definition of an underinsured motor vehicle. As pertinent here, this provision has the effect of excluding passengers of an insured’s vehicle from the policy’s underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage when the insured driver was at fault and was operating a vehicle insured by the policy’s liability coverage. The main purpose of this exclusion, as explained below, is to prevent a policy’s UIM coverage from acting as supplementary liability coverage under the same policy. The appellants here were injured while passengers in a vehicle insured by a policy containing this exclusion. The insurer, Mid-Century Insurance Company, denied UIM coverage based on the exclusion. The issue here is whether provisions in Wisconsin’s omnibus automobile insurance statute, WIS. STAT. § 632.32(5)(e) and (6)(b)2.a., prohibit or allow the exclusion. Like the circuit court, we resolve this issue against the appellant passengers. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order dismissing the passengers’ claims for UIM coverage.
Recommended for publication