By: Derek Hawkins//July 18, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Kathryn Marchetti et al v. Chicago Title Insurance Company et al
Case No.: 15-1240
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and EASTERBROOK and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges
Focus: Title Insurance – Duty to Defend
Title insurance company has no duty to defend appellant in real estate transaction gone awry.
“Indeed, the Marchettis appear to have turned a profit on the transaction, because they did not perform all of the planned work before they gave up their claim of ownership. The Marchettis tell us that $100,000 in renovation work was done. Jonathon Marchetti was the contractor and may have profited in that capacity, and at all events $100,000 is less than the construction-loan amount of $155,000. In the district court the Marchettis contended that they lost the profits they had anticipated from renting the improved property, but they have now acknowledged that the policy does not cover consequential damages. They suffered no capital loss, and that is all Chicago Title promised to make good. Since Chicago Title relieved them of the burden of the loan and mortgage, leaving them loss-free, it acquired the Marchettis’ claim against the fraud’s perpetrator and was entitled to collect from the restitution award”
Affirmed