By: Derek Hawkins//May 31, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: United States of America v. Robert A. Tate
Case No.: 15-3227
Officials: WOOD, Chief Judge, and SYKES and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Court Error – Career Offender
No error made as to credibility determinations, however, error in calculating guideline range for sentencing.
“Tate’s argument presents a question of law that we review de novo. United States v. Dyer, 464 F.3d 741, 743 (7th Cir. 2006), citing United States v. Hankton, 432 F.3d 779, 795 (7th Cir. 2005). Under the career offender provisions, a “controlled substance offense” is defined as “an offense under federal or state law, punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, that prohibits the manufacture, import, export, distribution, or dispensing of a controlled substance (or a counterfeit substance) or the possession of a controlled substance (or a counterfeit substance) with intent to manufacture, import, export, distribute, or dispense.” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(b). The definition includes “aiding and abetting, conspiring, and attempting to commit such offenses,” U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 cmt. n.1, so it does not matter that Tate’s anhydrous ammonia conviction was for attempted procurement. “
Vacated and Remanded for Resentencing