By: Derek Hawkins//February 2, 2016//
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Case Name: Ratina Bagwe v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., et al.,
Case No.: 14-3201
Officials: FLAUM, RIPPLE, and SYKES, Circuit Judges
Practice Area: Title VII
Appellant fails to prove up allegations of retaliatory termination and discrimination.
“Finally, Ms. Bagwe claims that she was terminated for retaliatory reasons.64 A termination is undoubtedly an adverse employment action. Oest, 240 F.3d at 613. However, Ms. Bagwe has not linked her termination to her complaints of discrimination, or established that the reasons given by Sedgwick are pretextual. Rather, Sedgwick’s rationale for terminating Ms. Bagwe has been consistent and finds support in the record. The PIP laid out in detail the company’s concerns with Ms. Bagwe’s leadership skills. The investigation showed that Sedgwick took Ms. Bagwe’s complaints of discrimination seriously and that its willingness to investigate her claims cannot be characterized as a punitive action. The termination came after numerous complaints from coworkers and Ms. Bagwe’s placement on a PIP. See Langenbach, 761 F.3d at 800 (affirming summary judgment where the timing and pretext arguments relied on “unbridled speculation,” and the record presented a clear history of performance issues). Ms. Bagwe therefore has not met her burden with regard to her claims of retaliation”
Affirmed