Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Physical placement

Oct 10, 2012

Family — physical placement

2012AP423-FT In re the marriage of: Rudek v. Rudek

Aug 31, 2012

Family – modification – custody – physical placement – child support

2010AP2445, 2011AP186 In re the marriage of: Sandberg v. Donahue

Jul 20, 2011

2010AP3067 State v. Przytarski

Family Physical placement; contempt

Jun 1, 2011

2010AP661 In re the marriage of: Hust v. Schrank

Family Physical placement Michael L. Schrank has appealed from an order denying his motion for modification of physical placement pertaining to his daughters, Nina and Anna. He also challenges the portion of the trial court’s order requiring him to pay guardian ad litem and expert fees related to this post-divorce litigation. We affirm the trial […]

Apr 6, 2011

2010AP914 In re the marriage of: Hying v. Hying

Family Custody; physical placement; modification Martin Hying appeals from an order which modified joint legal custody and the amount of his physical placement with his child. He argues that the circuit court was without authority to make the changes when there was no formal motion for modification and that the circuit court’s decision is not […]

Feb 1, 2011

2010AP607 In re the marriage of: Rindfleisch v. Rindfleisch

Family Physical placement; maintenance John Rindfleisch appeals from his judgment of divorce, arguing the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion with regard to the issues of primary placement and maintenance. We affirm the court’s determination regarding placement. We reverse on the issue of maintenance and remand for further proceedings. This opinion will not be published. […[...]

Dec 21, 2010

2010AP1791-FT In re the marriage of: Schmit v. Schmit

Family Physical placement; modification; change in circumstances Dale Schmit appeals from an order dismissing his motion for modification of physical placement. The circuit court determined Schmit failed to establish a substantial change in circumstances. Because the undisputed facts do not support the court’s determination, we reverse. On remand, the court shall determine whether modificati[...]

Nov 23, 2010

2009AP2837-FT In re the marriage of: Mastrodonato v. Mastrodonato

Family Custody; physical placement; child support Anthony Mastrodonato appeals from an order dismissing his motion to modify custody, physical placement and child support. Anthony argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion. We reject Anthony’s arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published. 2009AP2837-FT In re the marriage of: Mastrodonato v. Mastrodonato Dist II[...]

Nov 2, 2010

2009AP72 In re the marriage of: Pazdera v. Pazdera

Family Physical placement Roxann Pazdera appeals from an order revising physical placement, arguing the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in numerous respects. We affirm. This opinion will not be published. 2009AP72 In re the marriage of: Pazdera v. Pazdera Dist III, Marinette County, Duket, J., Per Curiam Attorneys: For Appellant: Schmieder, Theresa J., Green […]

Sep 23, 2010

2009AP2622 In re the marriage of: Matousek v. Matousek

Family Physical placement; GAL appointments John Matousek appeals from a post-divorce order denying his motion to modify his children’s physical placement schedule. The sole issue on appeal is whether the circuit court was required to appoint a guardian ad litem before deciding the motion. We conclude that the court was required to appoint a guardian […]

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests