Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Consecutive sentences

Mar 29, 2012

U.S. Supreme Court holds federal courts have discretion to order consecutive state, federal sentences

A U.S. District Court has the authority to order that a federal criminal sentence run consecutively to an anticipated state sentence that has yet to be imposed, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.

Mar 29, 2012

Sentencing — consecutive sentences

10-7387 Setser v. U.S.

Mar 13, 2012

Sentencing — consecutive sentences — discretion

2011AP633-CR, 2011AP634-CR State v. Wright

Feb 8, 2012

Sentencing — consecutive sentences

2011AP1263-CR State v. Powell

Nov 9, 2011

Sentencing — consecutive sentences — modification

2010AP933-CR State v. Malacara

Aug 23, 2011

2010AP1955-CR State v. Harris

Sentencing Good time; consecutive sentences

Aug 16, 2011

2010AP2179-CR State v. Linderman

Sentencing Consecutive sentences; double jeopardy

Feb 15, 2011

2010AP662-CR State v. Fitzpatrick

Sentencing Consecutive sentences Lonnell D. Fitzpatrick appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon his guilty pleas to two counts of second-degree sexual assault of a child. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The only issue is whether the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing consecutive rather […]

Dec 21, 2010

10-1304 U.S. v. Taylor

Sentencing Consecutive sentences Where the district failed to recognize it had discretion to impose sentences concurrently or consecutively, a limited remand is appropriate. “Although the supervised release policy statements were advisory well before the sentencing guidelines themselves were made advisory in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 267, 125 S. Ct. 738, 160 L. […]

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests