Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Opinion

Jun 21, 2017

1st Amendment Violation

The North Carolina statute impermissibly restricts lawful speech in violation of the First Amendment

Jun 21, 2017

Court Error – Habeas Corpus Relief

Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), a state prisoner is eligible for federal habeas relief if the underlying state court merits ruling was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law” as determined by this Court.

Jun 21, 2017

Statutory Interpretation

A company may collect debts that it purchased for its own account, like Santander did here, without triggering the statutory definition in dispute.

Jun 21, 2017

Equal Protection – Standing

The gender line Congress drew is incompatible with the Fifth Amendment’s requirement that the Government accord to all persons “the equal protection of the laws.”

Jun 21, 2017

Jurisdiction – Class Certification Review

Federal courts of appeals lack jurisdiction under §1291 to review an order denying class certification (or, as here, an order striking class allegations) after the named plaintiffs have voluntarily dismissed their claims with prejudice

Jun 21, 2017

Legislative Districts – Gerrymandering – Constitutionality

The North Carolina General Assembly redrew state legislative districts in 2011 to account for population changes revealed by the 2010 census.

Jun 21, 2017

ERISA – Church Plan

A plan maintained by a principal-purpose organization qualifies as a “church plan,” regardless of who established it.

Jun 21, 2017

Disgorgement

Because SEC disgorgement operates as a penalty under §2462, any claim for disgorgement in an SEC enforcement action must be commenced within five years of the date the claim accrued “The definition of “penalty” as a “punishment, whether corporal or pecuniary, imposed and enforced by the State, for a crime or offen[s]e against its laws,” Huntington v. Attrill, 146 U. S. 657, 667, gives [...]

Jun 21, 2017

Forfeiture – Ownership Interest

Because forfeiture pursuant to §853(a)(1) is limited to property the defendant himself actually acquired as the result of the crime, that provision does not permit forfeiture with regard to Terry Honeycutt, who had no ownership interest in his brother’s store and did not personally benefit from the illegal sales.

Jun 21, 2017

Intervenor

A litigant seeking to intervene as of right under Rule 24(a)(2) must meet the requirements of Article III standing if the intervenor wishes to pursue relief not requested by a plaintiff.

Jun 21, 2017

Sufficiency of Evidence – Jury Instruction

Following a three-day trial, a jury convicted Robert Stietz, the defendant, of resisting a law enforcement officer, Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1) (2013-14), and intentionally pointing a firearm at an officer, § 941.20(1m)(b).

Jun 21, 2017

Court Error – Judge Substitution

Petitioner, Edward J. Zimbal ("Zimbal"), seeks review of an unpublished court of appeals opinion affirming a circuit court order denying his postconviction motion.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests