Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / News/page 1231

News

01-1020-FT City of Stevens Point v. Wirtz

Michael C. Wirtz appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty under Wis. Stat. sec. 346.63(1)(a) for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant. Wirtz contends on appeal that the trial court erred in refusing to grant his motion for a mistrial after the prosecutor for the City of Stevens Point (City) elicited testimony from the ...

Read More »

00-3258 Burg, by his Legal Guardian, Gladys M. Weichert v. Cincinnati Casualty Insurance Co.

“‘Operate,’ under Wis. Stat.sec. 350.01(9r), includes ‘the exercise of physical control over the speed or direction of a snowmobile.’ ‘Operate,’ therefore, necessarily encompasses a person’s actions in stopping a snowmobile and turning off its motor because, literally, such actions do ‘exercise physical control over the speed and direction’ of the snowmobile. The fact that such actions stop the snowmobile certainly ...

Read More »

01-0684-CR State v. Sekula

Joanne Sekula appeals from a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (OWI), and from an order denying her motion for an evidentiary hearing on whether her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a pretrial motion to suppress evidence based upon an illegal stop. We conclude that Sekula was not ...

Read More »

00-3176 State v. Hughes

This is so because, “the jury’s unanimous findings (confirmed when the trial court polled the jury) that Hughes possessed cocaine with the intent to deliver it, and that he also possessed that cocaine were not inconsistent. Additionally, Hughes does not explain beyond mere rhetoric how the jury’s unanimous findings that Hughes both possessed cocaine and that he possessed that cocaine ...

Read More »

01-0709-CR State v. Smaxwell

Michael A. Smaxwell appeals from a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, third offense. Smaxwell argues that there was neither consent nor exigent circumstances to justify the warrantless search of his garage prior to his arrest. He also argues that the warrantless blood draw without his consent was illegal. We disagree on both issues and affirm. ...

Read More »

00-3538 State v. Norton

“It was not known to the trial court at the time of sentencing in this case that Norton’s probation would be revoked; rather, the trial court was advised by Hubbard that probation was not going to be revoked. Thus, the trial court imposed a sentence in this case which was based on inaccurate information. “Moreover, the inaccurate information was directly ...

Read More »

00-2237 State ex rel. Eppenger v. Litscher, et al.

Tony Eppenger appeals an order affirming a prison disciplinary decision given him while an inmate at Waupun Correctional Institution. The dispositive issue is whether substantial evidence supports that decision. We conclude that there was insufficient evidence to find Eppenger guilty of a disciplinary offense, and therefore we reverse. This opinion will not be published. Dist IV, Dane County, Callaway, J., ...

Read More »

01-0875, 01-0876 Wysocki v. Town of Kronenwetter, et al.

The Wysockis appeal from the trial court’s judgments dismissing their small claims actions seeking damages against the Town of Kronenwetter and its individual board members. In their complaints, the Wysockis allege that when the Town widened Oak Road in 1997, part of their land was improperly taken and damaged during the construction process. Because the Wysockis had never filed a ...

Read More »

00-3431-CR State v. Scott

William R. Scott appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence after he pled guilty to operating a vehicle without the owner’s consent. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to modify his sentence. Scott claims: (1) the trial court erred when it determined that the Criminal Penalties Study Committee’s proposal to reclassify the crime of operating ...

Read More »

00-2721 Biesterveld v. Roob

Mark Roob appeals from a default judgment in favor of Scott and Cindy Biesterveld. Roob is a professional photographer and photographed the Biestervelds’ wedding. Their complaint alleged that he breached a contract for the pictures, violated various provisions of Wisconsin’s consumer protection statutes, and used intentional misrepresentations to induce the contract. When he did not file a timely answer, the ...

Read More »

01-0752-CR State v. Chenal

Craig Chenal was involved in a break-in of an abandoned house owned by the estate of Morris White. The State appeals an order that Chenal owed no restitution as a result of his conviction for misdemeanor theft, party to a crime. The State sought restitution on behalf of Roxanne White, Morris’ niece. It claims that White is entitled to restitution ...

Read More »

00-3047 Heritage Mutual Insurance Company v. Janda

Richard and Colleen Janda appeal an order granting summary judgment to Heritage Mutual Insurance Company. The order precludes the Jandas from pursuing an uninsured motorist claim under their Heritage policy for personal injuries they sustained while riding their uninsured motorcycle. We conclude that under the language of the policy, a reasonable insured would not expect to have coverage for injuries ...

Read More »

01-0736-CR State v. Malkmus

Gary Malkmus appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence credit. We affirm the orders of the trial court. This opinion will not be published. Dist II, Winnebago County, Hawley, J., Brown, J. Attorneys: For Appellant: Gary R. Malkmus, Green Bay For Respondent: John M. Daniels, Oshkosh

Read More »

00-2719 Hein, et al. v. Frieberg, et al.

Jerome and Judith Hein appeal from a judgment declaring that a homeowners insurance policy issued to Thomas Frieberg did not provide coverage for Jerome’s injuries resulting from an automobile accident allegedly caused by Frieberg’s minor daughter. They contend the trial court erred in determining that the coverage in the policy for “liability … assumed by contract” did not include Frieberg’s ...

Read More »

01-0194 Jones v. Secura Insurance

Harold Jones appeals an order declaring that Stacie Jones, his daughter, is not covered by an automobile insurance policy issued to Jones Transportation, his business. The issue is whether the trial court correctly concluded that the policy did not provide underinsured motorist coverage to Stacie, who was seriously injured in an accident. We affirm. This opinion will not be published. ...

Read More »

00-1851, 00-1932 Bowles v. Quantum Chemical Company

“Although the record does not reveal the exact number of Quantum employees covered by the severance plan, it is clear that others in addition to Dr. Bowles were covered. The covered employees had a one-year period in which they could make a demand for severance benefits, which required Quantum to budget for the possibility of making multiple payments throughout the ...

Read More »

01-1723 In Re the Termination of Parental Rights to Quianna M.M.: La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey A.M.

This is an appeal from an order terminating Stacey A.M.’s parental rights to Quianna M.M. The issue is one of statutory interpretation: whether Wis. Stat. sec. 48.415(9) (1999-2000), which establishes “Parenthood as a result of sexual assault” as a ground for involuntary termination of parental rights, applies to a mother whose child was conceived as a result of intercourse with ...

Read More »

00-3117 EEOC v. North Gibson School Corporation

“Notably, the same courts that have confirmed the right of the EEOC to seek broad injunctive relief explicitly have disallowed an award of back pay to the individuals who could not have sought that relief themselves. … In the present case, the retirement benefits the EEOC seeks to obtain through injunctive relief for Anthis and Schleter serve the same function ...

Read More »

01-1438-NM, 01-1439-NM In Re the Termination of Parental Rights to Maryah Monika M., Dante Jovan M.: Brown County Department of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Antonio M., et al.

Tisa C. appeals orders terminating her parental rights to her two children and orders denying her post-termination motions. Tisa challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the jury’s finding beyond a reasonable doubt of the likelihood of serious emotional or physical damage to her children if they were in her care, as required by the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 ...

Read More »

01-0196 Curran v. Langlade County Board of Adjustment

The Langlade County Board of Adjustment appeals from a circuit court judgment reversing its decision relating to property owned by Patrick and Betty Curran. The issue is whether the board correctly determined that the Currans were required to apply for a zoning variance. We reverse the circuit court and, therefore, affirm the board’s decision. This opinion will not be published. ...

Read More »

00-1523, 00-2679 U.S. v. Bhutani

“While the plain language of the FDCA clearly prohibited the failure to establish or maintain records, criminal penalties were not clearly imposed. Nevertheless, we agree with the reasoning found in the former set of cases rather than the latter because strictly reading and applying the FDCA as it was at the time of the offense in question would put the ...

Read More »

01-1054-CR State v. Arnold

The State appeals an order suppressing incriminating statements that David Arnold made to police. The State argues that (1) Arnold was not in custody when he made the statements, and (2) Arnold’s statements were voluntary because the police used no coercive or improper tactics to induce him to make the statements. We agree that Arnold was not in custody and ...

Read More »

01-1733 Ashley v. U.S.

“The district court dismissed Ashley’s petition as untimely without reaching a conclusion about whether Apprendi applies retroactively to collateral attacks. We therefore issue a certificate of appealability, for given Apprendi the underlying constitutional claim must be deemed ‘substantial’ for purposes of 28 U.S.C. sec.2253(c)(2). See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-85 (2000). We remand so that the retroactivity decision ...

Read More »

00-2874-CR State v. Cucuta

Manuel Cucuta appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of two counts of first-degree intentional homicide, party to a crime, and one count of use of a dangerous weapon. Cucuta also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Cucuta argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for postconviction relief ...

Read More »

01-2006 Ruth v. U.S.

“Ruth asserted in his Rule 33 motion that his new evidence of Countryside Fragrances’s legitimate and independent existence supported his claim of innocence. He did not argue that the government violated Brady by failing to disclose this information, nor did he assert that the existence of this information rendered his sentence excessive or called into question the jurisdiction of the ...

Read More »

00-2897-CR State v. Spiller

Jerjuan D. Spiller appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying postconviction relief after a jury found him guilty of: two counts of kidnapping, two counts of first-degree sexual assault, two counts of armed robbery, and exposing a sex organ, all as party to a crime. Spiller claims that: (1) the trial court erred when it summarily denied ...

Read More »

00-2977 Estate of John D. Riley v. Ford Motor Company

“First, sending a fax to the consumer’s attorney is not the equivalent of a timely delivery of a refund check to the consumer. Second, delivery of a refund check to a dealership’s sales manager is not the equivalent of a timely delivery of a refund check to the consumer. “The law requires that the manufacturer provide a refund to the ...

Read More »

00-3288-CR State v. Bintz

David Bintz appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree murder, party to a crime, and an order denying postconviction relief. Bintz argues that (1) the trial court erred by admitting “sleep talk” evidence; (2) the court erred by refusing to admit proffered expert testimony at the Miranda-Goodchild hearing; and (3) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his ...

Read More »