Quantcast
Home / News (page 1192) /

News

01-1425-CR State v. Harding

The State appeals from a trial court order suppressing all evidence resulting from the arrest of Darryl A. Harding. The State contends that the trial court erred in finding that the arresting officer did not have “reasonable suspicion” to stop ...

Read More »

01-0577 Johnson v. City of Waukesha

The City of Waukesha appeals from the order of the circuit court which reversed the City’s decision to rescind the rooming house license issued to Lori A. Johnson. The City argues on appeal that its action rescinding Johnson’s license was ...

Read More »

01-0976-CR State v. Holland

Carlton Holland appeals from a judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdict, convicting him of one count of second-degree sexual assault while aided or abetted by another and one count of child enticement, as party to a crime. Holland argues that ...

Read More »

99-1666-CR, 00-0802-CR State v. LeRose

Paul Alan LeRose appeals pro se from a judgment of conviction of two counts of theft by fraud and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The conviction arises out of LeRose’s billing practices for services rendered to ...

Read More »

99-3331 State v. Tye

We further conclude that the evidence seized under this facially defective warrant must be suppressed. “As the circuit court wisely stated, the oath or affirmation requirement ‘is so basic to the Fourth Amendment that the Court simply can’t look at ...

Read More »

00-2321 U.S. v. Hunt

“In sentencing Hunt, the district court stated that Hunt was ‘only being charged with his actual participation in the criminal offense for which he has been convicted’ and that ‘none of the conspiracy activities are being charged to [him] in ...

Read More »

01-1197 State ex rel. Winters and Curtis v. Berge

Richard Winters and Al Curtis, inmates at the Supermax Correctional Institution, appeal the circuit court order quashing the writ of certiorari and dismissing their joint petition for certiorari review of decisions of the prison disciplinary committee. The ground for the ...

Read More »

01-2415 U.S. v. Mayberry

“Mayberry next argues that even if he did attack Coleman, he did not obstruct justice because the attack occurred after he had admitted his involvement in the conspiracy. Thus, he contends, he could not have interfered with ‘the investigation, prosecution, ...

Read More »

01-0604 Elrod v. Brommer

Kathy Elrod appeals a judgment dismissing her complaint against Elroy Brommer, who holds the power of attorney for Sylvina Brommer. Kathy argues that the circuit court erred when it determined that she lacked standing to maintain an action for injunctive ...

Read More »

00-4294 U.S. v. Kosmel

“Kosmel turns to … a proposed amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines. The Sentencing Commission recently published on its website a proposed amendment to the money laundering guideline and explained that the amendment would tie offense levels for money laundering more ...

Read More »

00-3399 Smith v. Williams, et al.

We conclude that the exclusive remedy provisions of sec. 66.05(3) apply only to claims premised on the reasonableness of the order to raze, not to claims such as those asserted by plaintiff which arise from acts that occur while carrying ...

Read More »

01-1353 U.S. v. Atwater

“[A]ll the sentencing judge said was that Atwater ‘either knew or should have known that a firearm would be involved in this case. I have never heard of a bank robbery without a firearm. That is sort of a given. ...

Read More »

01-0954 State v. Goetz

Although told to sit on the couch, this was not a situation where a reasonable person would have considered her freedom of movement to be restrained to the degree associated with a formal arrest. And, even though defendant was handcuffed ...

Read More »

00-3232 Haun v. Rankin, et al.

Mary Haun appeals a judgment dismissing her medical malpractice action against Dr. Thomas Rankin. The jury found that Rankin was negligent in his care and treatment of Haun but that his negligence did not cause Haun any injury. Haun argues ...

Read More »

01-1272 Egebergh v. Nicholson

“[A] reasonable jury could infer that Nicholson and Burdi were deliberately indifferent to Fitzgibbons’s welfare. They knew he was an insulin-dependent diabetic. They knew (Nicholson certainly, Burdi probably) that diabetics can be seriously harmed by being deprived of insulin. They ...

Read More »

00-860 Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko

“[I]it is clear that the claim urged by respondent is fundamentally different from anything recognized in Bivens or subsequent cases. In 30 years of Bivens jurisprudence we have extended its holding only twice, to provide an otherwise nonexistent cause of ...

Read More »

01-0506 State v. Malcom

“Despite Cole’s acceptance of full responsibility for the criminal activities, substantial and unchallenged evidence also implicated Malcom. For instance, Johnson, [defendant’s girlfriend], testified that when she threatened to call the police, Malcom told her not to do so because of ...

Read More »

01-1551-FT Boley v. Rankin, et al.

Carol Boley appeals a summary judgment dismissing her medical malpractice claim. Boley argues that the circuit court erred as a matter of law by finding that her claim was barred by the statute of limitations. We disagree and affirm. This ...

Read More »